The Thousand Years of Revelation 20


By TaI Brooke


          I was on a plane going from Tel Aviv to Los Angeles, returning from a trip to Israel with Chuck Smith and 300 others on the annual tour. He and I were co-authoring a book on Calvary Chapel, an explosively successful church movement he had pioneered in the heyday of the Jesus Movement (Harvest; Old Tappenl, NJ: Chosen-Books/Fleming H. Revell Co., 1987). He heard about me through different sources, including his friends Bill Bright and Pat Means, who had flown me out to California a few years before to film my testimony. He was intrigued by my conversion from Eastern mysticism after two years in India under a “miracle-worker.” Smith’s Calvary Chapel of Costa Mesa was one of the largest megachurches in the nation, and famous for its tens of thousands of attendees-and there were at least ten other Calvary Chapels in the region, each attended by more than 6,000 people.

          Chuck Smith and I were both leaders on the Israel trip as we crossed the land, traveling from Galilee to Jerusalem. Both of us had a full bus to oversee. We had an unusually good rapport and mutual trust. At the major sites, Chuck spoke as modern Israel became a tableaux against which premillennial prophecy had been applied constantly, site after site.

          Now, on the plane back to L.A. I was trying to process a prophetic interpretation with which I’d never felt comfortable: the expectation of an earthly millennium to be set up after Christ’s return following the Great Tribulation.” This idea was, to me, a new spin on the Second Coming.

          Christ was to rule the earth from Jerusalem for a thousand years. Some believe this would be not just after the “Great Tribulation,” but after the vials of wrath (see Revelation) had been poured out in planetary judgment. Taken literally, the oceans would have turned blood-red, a third of its creatures dead, and unspeakable heat from the sun would have killed millions, along with things far worse. In all, it was a picture of vast ecological damage with an earth left in smoking ruins, billions of inhabitants dead.

          Now imagine trying to set up shop and pick up the pieces from there to jump-start a millennium of universal bounty!

          The incongruity of Christ occupying a third temple didn’t fit the Jesus in the pages of the Bible. His only prediction about the temple was its certain destruction within that generation (which happened in A .D. 70 when Titus destroyed the city and the temple). Many believe that Christ, in His new role as Messiah, would reinstitute animal sacrifices. The very Lamb of God, who was once foreshadowed by such temple sacrifices, had Himself annulled them by His ransom sacrifice on the Cross-indeed, their final fulfillment. The idea that He would once again oversee these same Old Covenant animal sacrifices was unthinkable!

A Judaized apocalyptic vision was trumping the long-accepted Christian view of the Kingdom of God. The Old Covenant, in a castling chess move, was replacing the New Covenant in a step backward as Mosaic law was replacing the gospel of grace. The thought of Christ assuming an earthly throne in Jerusalem, amid pollution and rotting flesh everywhere from the recent “tribulation” was just too untenable.

          On a practical level, if we take the literal interpretation route, the millennial survivors would need centuries to clean-up the oceans and lakes and rivers (imagine filtering out the heavy metals and toxins in Lake Erie alone—much less the vast Pacific), and to bury the millions of dead, just to make the planet livable.

          To me, a figurative symbol was being forced into a literal context with a convoluted timescale along with many incongruous pieces. The practical problems of going from symbol to literal are massive, if not insurmountable.

          The only thing you can do with a world in utter ruins like that is remake it, I thought, and it’s exactly what the Second Epistle of Peter said and what the early church believed: “The elements will melt in fervent heat,” and a new heavens and a new earth will come (2 Peter 3:7-12). It doesn’t imply just a surface-cleaning of the old world during some post-Judgment Day millennium.

          After returning from India newly converted, I first encountered millennialism in Hal Lindsey’s megabestseller The Late Great Planet Earth, a book that at first thrilled me then stopped me cold in my tracks. My spirit resisted some major parts of this sleek schema being aggressively marketed as prophecy. I sensed a teaching powerful enough to seduce millions. The fact the secular publishing giants published it was a red flag in itself; Rather than gaining the world’s enmity, this “Christian” belief curried the world’s favor. Why did the secular publishing giants want to disseminate this “Christian” view? Cui bono—who gains? I will leave the question there.


Dispensational Premillennialism

          In the 1800s began the Dispensationalism movement, based on a peculiar reading of prophecy that the church had never quite seen before. A key point in its system was what it termed “premillennialism,” or the expectation of a future earthly millennium. When the term “millennialism” is used, it usually refers to the various doctrines of premillennialism, and more specifically to Dispensational Premillennialism. This thousand years, or “chiliad,” is applied to a single verse in the entire Bible, to the period of time mentioned in Rev. 20: 1-7. Specifically, premillennialists use the word to refer to a supposed thousand-year reign of Christ on Earth after the “rapture of the saints.” Literal earthly millennialism teaches that the Jews rejected Jesus in the middle of His earthly ministry, thus making it impossible to fulfill at that time the prophecy and the purposes of God. So He stopped the prophetic clock, and postponed the fulfillment of His promise until the Second Coming. Thus the Church is now seen as an interim measure. Chiliasm, or premillennialism in its simple form foreseeing a Jewish world kingdom, originated in the Jewish apocalyptic writings of rabbis of the intertestamental period during the development of the Babylonian Talmud, the “traditions of the elders,” which Jesus condemned. By invoking “postponement theory,” this Dispensational appropriation of the

Jewish millennium negates Christ’s final proclamation on the Cross that “It is finished.” No, they would say to Christ; “You are wrong. It is not finished.”

          Dispensationalism implies that for the 1800 years of the church’s long history, the very Spirit of Truth who was promised to bring believers into all truth, failed to show the church the truth, and that not until Darby, Irving and Scofield came along were things finally set straight. This meant the Holy Spirit failed to show the church this truth, and that the early church fathers missed it, as did all the great saints through history who either didn’t see the pattern or rejected parts of it. Thus the Holy Spirit defaulted on His charge of guiding the church into all truth.

          But this paradox is a red flag in itself. The late arrival of this novel teaching is the real red flag, not the failure of the Spirit of Truth. Later on, I discovered the early church fathers didn’t miss it at all; they rejected millennialism at its root from the earliest beginnings of the church. The Rapture was not yet a teaching at that point.

          An invaluable clue emerged in the research of Curtis Dickinson in his paper, “Millennialism”: According to Eusebius’ Ecclesiastical History, Book III, a heretic named Cerinthus first introduced the millennial doctrine into the early church. The result? The Apostle John, the very disciple who recorded the book of Revelation, refused to bathe in the same bathhouse as Cerinthus the millennialist, calling him “that enemy of the truth.”

          The Apostle John, and not a contemporary named Cerinthus, would have the best understanding of the meaning of Revelation 20. John—the great Apostle who recorded the book of Revelation, including chapter 20—rejected millennialism.

          Professor George Fletcher, in his lengthy paper “The Millennium: What It Is Not,” has provided another important clue: Millennialism never was supported by any of the great creeds, but on the other hand, was condemned by the Second Helvetic Confession, the Augsburg Confession (Article 17), and the original, articles of the Church of England, where it says:

          They that go about to renew the fable of heretics called Millinnarii be repugnant to Holy Scriptures, and cast themselves to a Jewish dotage. (Article XLI)


Fletcher notes that the Second Helvetic Confession is also very strongly worded. The article on Judgment contains this sentence:

  Moreover we reject the Jewish dreams that there will be before the day of judgment a golden age upon the earth and the pious will take possession of the kingdoms of the world after their enemies, the ungodly, have been subdued.


          The Council of Ephesus in A.D. 431 had also condemned millennialism as superstition, and the doctrine of the Millennium was officially discarded by the church as heresy. Of heresy, Dr. Donald W. Richardson, in The Revelation of Jesus Christ, says:


If we define heresy as ‘doctrine that contradicts the historical universal Christian faith,’ or as ‘an opinion opposed to the commonly received doctrine, and tending to division or dissension,’ then Darbyism, or Dispensationalism, as it is widely taught today, is heresy.


          So what is the commonly received doctrine from the early church on that repudiates millennialism? Maybe there is a clue in the words of the New



Christ’s Kingdom

          Christ distinguished His eternal kingdom from an earthly millennial kingdom in His confession before Pontius Pilate, declaring, “My kingdom is not of this world” ‘(John 18:36,37). This is unmistakably clear.

          Wasn’t that the very reason the Jews of Christ’s day rejected Him as Messiah?—that He was not bringing their long-awaited earthly kingdom?

 In the words of John, Christ’s Kingdom is not of a worldly origin or nature, nor is the world its end or object. It is not defended by worldly power, influence or carnal weapons; but by bearing witness to the truth, the preaching of the Gospel with the Holy Spirit sent down from Heaven. None can enter it except those who are born from above. It is beyond this world (John 3:3,5).

          Fletcher notes in his abovementioned paper:

Christ is silent about a corporeal reign in a world kingdom of Jewish supremacy for a thousand years with headquarters in Jerusalem AFTER His Second Advent. Neither the Gospels nor the book of Acts speak of a thousand-year kingdom on earth in which there will be mingled both mortals and immortals. The Epistles give no hint of a return to Palestine of natural, carnal, fleshly Israel; but, instead, many of the epistles were written to counteract the Judaizing tendencies of Jewish converts.


As classic commentators agree, the early church’s view of the “thousand years” described in Revelation 20 was accepted as figurative of Christ’s spiritual reign in the present Gospel Age of the church between the First and Second Comings.

          As we shall see in more detail later, the Old Testament promises of the Messiah were fulfilled in Christ; Satan was “bound” at the Cross and the Resurrection of Christ; there is now only one, “Israel,” which is the Church made up of both Jews and Gentiles; the Resurrection and the Second Coming are all one single simultaneous event, followed immediately by the one general Judgment and then the eternal state (the “new heavens and new earth).

          William Killgore illustrates his awakening out of Dispensationalism as a young believer in the 21st century in his paper “Realized Millennialism” when he confesses:


 “When I was a premillennialist, I saw the millennium all over the Scriptures as I read and studied. However, as my eschatological views began to change, I realized that all those passages from the OT prophets that I took as descriptions of “the millennium” were arbitrarily jammed together. I had never stepped back and taken a look at this jigsaw puzzle that premillennialists had put together in my mind. Rather than presenting a clear picture, premillennialism had put together a jumbled mess!:


          Killgore asks, “If the thousand years are literal, why is Rev. 20 the only passage in all of Scripture that specifically mentions a millennial kingdom?” He adds, “It’s not as if the Old Testament prophets and the New Testament Apostles simply didn’t mention the millennial kingdom, but rather in several places where it could have appeared, it is positively excluded from the entire prophetic picture!”


Killgore lists what he found:

1. All of the OT passages normally linked with the “thousand years” of Rev. 20 to produce “the millennium” are already interpreted for us under inspiration within the NT itself. These passages are—Isa. 2, 9:6-7, 11,25-27,49, 65; Jer. 23, 30-31; Eze. 34-37; Joel 2-3; Amos 9; Zech. 12-14; and Mal. 3-4. Also, none of the imagery used in these passages (“lambs w/lions,” “heating swords into plowshares,” etc.) is even mentioned in Rev. 20, the only passage to mention “thousand years”! The nation of Israel is not in view, nor is an earthly reign or rebuilt temple! To cram all these passages together and then arbitrarily interpret them Within the context of Rev. 20 is textual misrepresentation and manipulation.

          2. Without question, 2 Peter 3 mentions absolutely nothing of a millennial kingdom. In fact, such a notion is ruled out by placing the destruction of this earth and the creation of the new earth within the same time frame as the Second Coming (2 Peter 3:7-12). This reforming of the planet occurs just before the eternal state per Rev. 6-7.

          3. Paul sets forth only one Second Coming, one Resurrection, and then the end-I Cor. 15. The only reign of Christ mentioned is the present one.

          4. Scripture teaches one resurrection of all men, both saved and unsaved, at the last day (John 5:29, 11:24; Heb. 9:27 w/Rev. 20:11-12).

          5. The gathering together with Him occurs at His coming in John 6:39,54; 1 Cor. 15:23; Col. 3:4; 1 Thes. 4:14-17; 2 Thes. 2:1; 1 Peter 1:13; 5:4. Further, there’s nothing “secret” about it! (cf. Matt. 24:27, Luke 17:24)

          6. Both the righteous and the wicked are separated at His coming per Matt. 13, 24:37-40, 25:31-46; Luke 17:29-35. Note especially the word “then” in Matt. 25:31. It is at this time that saint and sinner alike are judged —not after 1,000 years! See Ecc. 12:14; Dan. 12:2; Matt. 16:27, 24:41-46; Rom. 2:5-6; 1 Cor. 3:13; Ccl. 3:4; 1 Thes. 5:1-10; 2 Thes. 1:1-10; 2 Tim. 2:4; 4:1; Heb. 9:28; 1 Pet. 5:4; 1 John 2:28; 3:2. Thus the Second Coming is the same day as “the day of judgment” (2 Pet. 2:9}—the same day this earth is destroyed per 2 Peter 3:7-12! Where is this “thousand-year” earthly kingdom in all of this? It is this day that is pictured in Rev. 6: 16-17 and 11:15-18. Note the parallel between Rev. 11:15 and 1 Cor. 15:24-28, where Paul describes “the end” immediately following His coming. This is why the next consciOus moment after death is the Judgment, not the millennium—Heb. 9:27.

          7. If God’s people are reigning with Christ on the earth during a literal 1,000-year kingdom, then how can the Kingdom be descending from heaven in Rev. 21:2?


Looking at Revelation 20 itself reveals more problems with the idea of a literal millennial kingdom. First, while earthly events are mentioned (v. 3, 9), no earthly reign is mentioned. Christ is not described as on a literal throne, reigning in a literal earthly kingdom. Furthermore, we find nothing about national Israel, a rebuilt temple, restored sacrifices, etc.

          While it is obvious that the “thousand years is mentioned in the text, the picture presented in no way matches the dispensational picture. Further, the Judgment occurs in v. 11-15, after the “thousand years”! This fact alone destroys premillennialism, as the passages above clearly show that the Judgment occurs at His coming with no mention of an intervening time period, much less some 1,000-year kingdom.

          There is still the matter of the “thousand years” in Rev. 20. Killgore discovered what others before him had already found: Numbers are often symbolic. The number of the angels in Rev. 5:11 is “ten thousand times ten thousand, and thousands of thousands.” Yet we know that the number of angels is actually “innumerable” (Heb. 12:22).

          We see “thousand(s)” used symbolically all over Scripture-Gen. 24:60; Ex. 20:6, 34:7; Lev. 26:8; Deut. 1:11, 5:10; 7:9; 32:30, 33:2; Joshua 23:10; 1 Sam. 18:7-8; 1 Chron. 16:15; Job 9:3, 33:23; Ps. 3:6, 50:10, 68:17, 84:10, 90:4, 91:7, 105:8; Eec. 6:6, 7:28; Song 5:10; Isa. 30:17, 60:22; Jer. 32:18; Eze. 48; Dan. 7:10, 11:12; Micah 6:7; 1 Cor. 4:15, 14:19; 2 Pet. 3:8; Jude 14.

          So then, what exactly does the “thousand years” of Rev. 20 refer to?

          It refers to the present kingdom, the reign of Jesus Christ at the right hand of God now, during the church age between the First and Second Advents— as most of the early church believed. The Apostle John certainly believed in a present kingdom (Rev. 1 :9). Rev. 20 has believers reigning as

kings and priests” (verse 6) - a future reality? Not according to the same book! John clearly sees this reality coming to be in the death, Resurrection, and Ascension of Christ (Rev. 5:10). Being “kings” and “priests” to God is something that is comprehended in our redemption in Jesus Christ, which is why John speaks of this very thing as a present reality (Rev. 1 :6). Paul clearly taught the same in 1 Cor. 15:24-28.

          Paul teaches that Christ’s Second Coming will signal the end, not the beginning, of His role as Messiah. Jesus stated that He now possesses “all power” in heaven and on earth (Matt. 28:18). Consider this important statement carefully. What can be added to “all”? Does our Lord have “all power now, or doesn’t He?

          Meanwhile, adding to present-day confusion, premillennialists have consistently given wrong dates for the Christ’s return, though this hasn’t given them pause to reflect on whether they might be deemed as false teachers: date-setting, in defiance of Scripture, and getting it wrong at that!

          Curtis Dickinson, in his paper “Millennialism,”


          It would take a large volume to list all the people who have preached that Armageddon and Christ’s return would have already happened by the year 2000.... Salem Kirban wrote in 1970 that Christ would come for the Rapture in approximately 1989, and that the Millennium would begin in the year 2000.... Jack Van Impe has given various “end time” dates and scenarios, with judgment about to fall in 1976, the tribulation beginning by 1980, chaos in the Sun and the Earth in 1982, the world running out of food by 1984 and finally an end time date of 1996. Hal Lindsey, in his “Countdown to Armageddon,” had the end set in the 1990s. Pat Robertson had Armageddon pinpointed for 1982. W.S. McBride wrote that his study indicated that Jesus would return before 2000. A.D. Edgar Whisenant’s book

claimed that the Rapture would take place on September 12, 1988, with the Millennium beginning January 2000. Harold Camping sold over 50,000 copies of a book [that] set September 6, 1994 for the end.


          The truth is, for the system to work there must be a third coming. That they define the Second Coming as “secret” for the Rapture to take place requires a third public and universal coming later in the calendar.

          After Cerinthus, whom the Apostle John called “that enemy of the truth,” others introduced millennialism. In A.D. 255 Nepos, an Egyptian bishop advocated that “there would be a certain Millennium of sensual luxury on this earth” (History of the Christian Church, Vol. 2, Philip Schaff; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans Pub. Co., June 1960; p. 299). Schaff makes another important point in the above classic work: “Though Millennialism had been suppressed by the early church, it was nevertheless from time to time revived by heretical sects.”

          As many have noted, if such a thing as a thousand years of Christ’s political rule on Earth were to be in the Christian’s future, it is unthinkable that Jesus and the Apostles never had anything to say about it. Nowhere in the New Testament is there any reference to a “millennial” kingdom after the return of Jesus.

          Rather, Jesus and the apostles all taught that at His coming there would be an immediate final judgment, leaving only the genuine believers, who will be made immortal to live in the new creation of God for eternity. They allowed neither time nor place for a “thousand-year” physical reign on this present Earth.

          Christ’s Kingdom is not a natural earthly kingdom but a spiritual one. As William Killgore observed in his quest, if we examine the following New Testament passages-Luke 17:20-21; John 3:3, 5-7, 18:36; Rom. 14:17; 1Cor. 4:20; 15:50; Col. 1:13; 1Thes. 2:12; 2 Tim. 4:18; Heb. 12:28; 2 Pet. 1:11- they expressly teach that the Kingdom:


1. Does not come “with observation” (lit., ‘with outward show’).

2. Is “within” believers.

3. Cannot be entered, nor even seen apart from spiritual rebirth.

4. Is not of this world.

5. Has nothing to do with substances like “food and drink,” but rather is manifested in the changed character of individual Christians.

6. Is not simply a message, but a demonstration of spiritual power.

7. Is an incorruptible Kingdom that cannot be inherited by corruption-our mere “flesh and blood.

8. Is the present reality where we are “translated” when we are delivered from the powers of darkness.

9. Is where God has “ called” us in saving us.

10. Is not earthly, but “heavenly.”

11. “Cannot be moved” -i.e., is of a spiritual nature.

12. Is “everlasting” even in its final manifestation.


Appeals to the Old Testament

          To defend their view of a future millennial kingdom, premillennialists resort to citing passages of Scripture in Jeremiah and Ezekiel, which foretell the rebuilding of the temple and other aspects regarding the nation of Israel.

          But as Bible scholars have known since the early church, these passages are not about the millennium at all. They are about the ancient remnant of Jewish exiles returning to Jerusalem immediately after the Babylonian captivity.

Jeremiah prophesied before the Babylonian captivity and foretold its 70-year duration. Ezekiel also wrote during that time. These great prophets were referring to the restoration of the temple and city immediately after the Babylonian captivity, 500 years before Christ, as did Daniel. They were not

writing about some distant future millennium.

Incidentally, the very same passages are also used to justify a third return of the Jews to the land of Palestine in our time, so it gets confusing.

          God allowed a remnant of the ancient Israelites to return in repentance from their Babylonian captivity to rebuild the temple in Jerusalem. This is recorded in the book of Ezra (1:1-3,5). The contemporary names of ancient rulers such as Cyrus make it impossible for these verses to refer to any time in history but then!


1. Now in the first year of Cyrus king of Persia, that the word of the LORD by the mouth of Jeremiah might be fulfilled , the LORD stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia, that he made a proclamation throughout all his kingdom, and put it also in writing, saying.

2. Thus saith Cyrus king of Persia, The LORD God of heaven hath given me all the kingdoms of the earth; and he hath charged me to build him an house at Jerusalem, which is in Judah.

3. Who is there among you of all his people? His God be with him, and let him go up to Jerusalem which is in Judah, and build the house of the LORD God of Israel, (he is the God,) which is in Jerusalem.

Skipping ahead to verse 5...

5. Then rose up the chief of the fathers of Judah and Benjamin, and the priests, and the Levites, with all them whose spirit God had raised, to go up to build the house of the LORD which is in Jerusalem. (Ezra 1: 1.3,5)


          God was answering the repentant prayers of the Hebrews who were in Babylonian captivity. They were granted a single return to restore Jerusalem and the temple! It is critical to note here that part of their return was in repentance and belief.

          Historians tell us the second temple was completed between 520 and 516 B.C. It was dedicated with great rejoicing. The prophecy of Jeremiah 33:7-8 did come true as stated below:


7. And I will cause the captivity of Judah and the captivity of Israel to return, and will build them, as at the first.

8. And I will cleanse them from all their iniquity, whereby they have sinned against me; and I will pardon all their iniquities, whereby they have sinned, and where by they have transgressed against me.


          Jeremiah 33, having been fulfilled, cannot be reapplied again and again. It was satisfied to the letter after the Babylonian captivity. God made good on His promise of the return to the land!

          The establishment of the modem nation of Israel in 1948 by the United Nations is a key milestone in premillennial doctrine, seen as the ancient Israelites returning to their homeland in what is a third return.

          But only one return to rebuild the temple and Jerusalem was ever promised in those often cited ancient prophecies-and that has already taken place, enabling Christ to walk the streets of Jerusalem in His day.

          The ancient prophecies cited to justify present day Israel have already been fulfilled in the ancient world after Babylon. Premillennialists, looking for wiggle room, have learned to echo the claims of Zionists: that Israel never received all of the land promised by God, therefore it was never fulfilled, which is why so many American Christians want the Israelis of today to take land from the Arabs by any means possible.

          But wait! Rewind the tape to Joshua’s time. Here is what the Bible states to refute the modem claim that not all the land was given by God:


21:43 And the LORD gave unto Israel all the land which he swore to give unto their fathers; and they possessed it, and dwelt therein.

21:44 And the LORD gave them rest round about, according to all that he sware unto their fathers: and there stood not a man of all their enemies before them; the LORD delivered all their enemies into their hand.

21:45 There failed not ought of any good thing which the LORD had spoken unto the house of Israel; all came to pass. (Jos. 21:43-45, KJV)


Here it is: “And the LORD gave until Israel all the land which he sware to give unto their fathers There failed not ought of any good thing which the LORD had spoken unto the house of Israel: all came to pass.”

          “All came to pass,” and God’s promise was fulfilled then and there! So the present charge that the full land claim was never fulfilled is wrong. Yet some dispute this, and the land-claim debate continues. Related to who might be entitled to a land claim if it still existed, I noticed, during the visit to Israel, that there are ongoing debates as to who can claim to be a true Hebrew. In the face of the destruction of all the ancient tribal genealogical records (critical for temple functions), proof is impossible. I was made more aware of the ongoing tensions between Sephardic and Ashkenazi Jews as well as their centuries of intermarriage with non-Jews. As Alan Morrison (a converted Jew) pointed out in the Sep Journal, “The Two Jerusalems,” more than 80 percent of today’s Jews, the Ashkenazis, are almost certainly descended from the mass conversion that took place in A.D. 750 in the kingdom of the Khazars and therefore, as converted gentiles, are not The descčndants of Jacob (Israel), and as such, have no legitimate land claim.

          The above factors would complicate the Dispensational view of the present “return” of modern-day Jews to Israel. It would also present a problem in the populating of a pure-blooded Biblical Hebrew-only millennial kingdom.

          My thought then was that a remnant in today’s world might qualify as being of the pure bloodline of the ancient Hebrews, but it would be no more than a very small remnant; and only the mind of God would know who they were.


Messianic Rule

          There are many variations of the premillennial theme, but they are all overshadowed by the Jewish apocalyptic vision of a culmination of history in an exclusively Jewish-ruled world centered in Jerusalem in which material goods are supplied in abundance; all want, crime, and sickness are eliminated; and their Messiah will sit on David’s throne and rule over all. As has been observed, this doctrine is a plain denial of the claims of Jesus and the apostles that Jesus already reigns as Lord and King and is the present fulfillment of all these very messianic prophecies.

          The very Old Testament prophecies that foretold the establishment of the Messiah’s kingdom and his reign upon the throne of David were announced and applied at the birth of Jesus, in Luke 1:32:33.

New Testament Scriptures also unmistakably declare that these prophecies were fulfilled in Christ’s Ascension when “He sat down on the right hand of the majesty on high” (Heb. 1:3). At that time, “[God] made him to sit at his right hand in the heavenly places, far above all rule and authority, and power, and dominion” (Eph. 1:20,21).

          On the Day of Pentecost, Peter announced that Jesus was the one whom God raised up to sit on David’s throne (Acts 2:29-36; note also Acts 13:23). It was an accomplished fact; not something waiting to be fulfilled thousands of years later. Both John the Baptist and Jesus announced that the Kingdom was “at hand,” and never suggested that “at hand” meant that it was to come some 2,000 years later. (Matt. 4:17, Mark 1: 15).


          Just before His Ascension, Jesus declared, “All authority has been given unto me in heaven and on earth” (Matt. 28:19). That’s why Paul tells us in Col. 1:13, “God has delivered us out of the power of darkness and translated us into the kingdom of His son.” He is not referring to some distant future millennial reign, because Christ was reigning in Paul’s day, and continues to reign in the midst of His foes and with His people in willing subjection. John wrote that Jesus “made us to be a kingdom, to be priests unto his God and Father” (Rev. 1:6). This is Christ’s Kingdom of which we are already part in the present.

          According to Paul, Jesus was already reigning and will reign until the Day of Resurrection and Judgment, when death will be abolished. Then comes the end.

          When Christ comes again it will be in judgment of all who have opposed and denied Him (2 Thes. 1:7-10) as well as those who believed in Him. The latter He will award eternal life, so that “the kingdoms of the world are become the kingdoms of our Lord and of His Christ, and He shall reign for ever and ever” (Rev. 11: 15).

          As the early church realized in leaving Old Covenant expectation, it is time to stop looking for an earthly physical millennium and believe the Old Testament prophecies which have been fulfilled in Christ and His eternal Kingdom.


Discerning Truth

          During the return flight from Israel, I was grateful for the fact that when I first read the Bible in India it was without some gradient of interpretation that had been overlaid on the text-one that forced a pattern of belief rather than allowing the text to speak in plain meaning so a pattern could emerge on its own.

          After the gradient of interpretation reveals the intended schema it is like an optical illusion. You might see it one way briefly at first, but then it shifts to the dominant view, and that becomes the only way you can see it. You are now trapped in seeing the pattern only one way, though you may know there is another perspective. This can happen to doctrines. One view can take precedent, blinding you to other interpretations. In the realm of deception, this is a formidable thing. It’s also how deception works.

          It made sense to me that a one-way doctrinal “optical illusion” might deceive millions in the Christian subculture who have read Scripture with the same gradient of interpretation placed over the text-now locked in on a single paradigm. When big names push this view in bestsellers and in TV appearances, the system gains even more ground. No one dares suspect it might be flawed. On the tour I saw countless copies of the Scofield Bible marked up by avid readers. I noticed it interprets the text in the printed margin notes on every page, this great Dispensational Bible. It was like being handed special glasses to help you read the Bible. The Apostle Paul warns us that ‘‘strong delusion” will come, decimating the church by inundating believers in waves of deception. This delusion will grow in intensity as we approach “the end” of the age. It. is a process that might explain “the great falling away” predicted as the church age reaches its end. The terrible shape of this delusion could well be growing before us.

          So we must each discern for ourselves. We can’t make a critical decision based on some famous authority or because the great herd of believers went along with a belief because it was popular. We must be able to think for ourselves when being guided by the Word of God. When people awaken from deception, they find the answer was there in Scripture all along if they’d only checked.

          Christ is King of Kings and Lord of Lords in the present, “Wherefore, receiving a kingdom which cannot be shaken, let us have grace, whereby we may offer service well-pleasing to God with reverence and awe” (Heb. 12:28).

          Those of us in Christ should be supremely grateful that we can look forward to a glory that goes beyond our ability to conceive, as Paul says of his visit to the third heaven. In the present fallen world we must be encouraged that the final heavenly outcome of things will be beyond what words can describe.


From CHRISTIAN NEWS November 11.2013 Page 13

Reprinted with permission from the SCP Journal

Volume 32:2-32:3 2008; pp 14-23


          Tal Brooke is the President & Chairman of SCP.

He has authored nine books and his work has been recognized in Marquis Who's Who in the World and Who’s Who in America. He has won three first place EPA awards in the nationwide contest. A graduate of the University of Virginia and Princeton, he has spoken at Cambridge, Oxford, Princeton, Sorbonne, Berkeley, the University of Virginia, and the University of Edinburgh. Tal Brook was converted in India.


Spiritual Counterfeits Project. P. 0. Box 40015,

Pasadena, CA 91114- 7015

The preceding article is provided for educational purposes only and cannot be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder.