Two stately, young women, without identifying themselves, handed me a tract across the yard fence, entitled, 'Has Religion Betrayed America?' An interesting subject indeed, but a quick look at the material revealed that it did not deal with the title subject at all, but proposed to set you up for the Russellite doctrines. They were, "Jehovah's Witnesses."
Two young men rang my doorbell one Saturday morning, desiring
to talk with me about 'all the sickness and disease that was spread over
the nation.' They confessed, only when I insisted upon identity, that they
were "Jehovah's Witnesses." When I had quoted and applied far too much
Scripture for their taste, one of them stated that I thought I was God
Almighty and they left haughtily. When they leave, I am always left a little
sick and with mixed emotions. I am angered, because of the hell filling
heresy they will spread on down the street. I am also burdened because
I know they are victims of their own snare, and are faithfully working
their way to hell.
I write this tract because wherever you are and whoever you are, you will sooner or later he subtly attacked by someone, who will under question or after they have aroused sufficient interest in you, announce that they are 'Jehovah's Witnesses.' They are not. They are Salesmen for the Serpent. They are ambassadors of the devil. You might reply, 'Now mister, that is an unkind thing to say about anyone's religious convictions.' I answer, 'Kindness is not my first obligation, but truth.' Paul said concerning false teachers. "I would they were even cut off" (put to death) (Gal. 5:8-12). The lord said concerning false teachers, "Ye make them twofold more a child of hell than yourselves." He called them hypocrites, blind guides and fools (Matt. 23:14-23). The swords of these mistaken crusaders are dripping with the blood of the unlearned and unwary. You, your children, and your neighbor's children are their targets. Do we have a right to ignore them by saying 'every man to his own religion'? Certainly not! They are more dangerous and less discriminating than the 'mad scientist' who would poison a city water supply with a deadly but undetectable bacteria. I will, therefore, deal with just a few of their most vital and deadly heresies, and try to give some Bible instruction as to what your reaction should be, when they call. Since they are victims of their own destructive devices, I will give more space to Bible truth than to the "Jehovah's Witnesses" heresy which it refutes so that, if possible, I may help to enlighten any "Jehovah's Witnesses" who may read this tract, for I desire to see them saved.
When Satan came to Eve in the garden, he pretended that he
wanted to enlighten her to an opportunity to be wise and God-like (Gen.
3:4,5). What he, in fact, desired to do and did, was to slander God (Gen.
3:5) and bring death to the human race (Gen. 4:8 and Gen. chapter 5). When
any religious ambassador hesitates to identify himself, as did Satan in
the garden, or tries to disguise the subject he really wishes to discuss,
his approach is Satanic and his religion will almost certainly he the same.
By this I mean that they deny that Jesus Christ was Jehovah God, manifested in the flesh. They claim that He was a created being. They refer to Him in John 1:1 of their ridiculously dishonest and unscholarly translation of the Bible, "The New World Translation", as 'a god'. (Note the small g).
What does the Bible say about this? It says that Jesus, the
incarnate word, was God (John 1:1-3, John 1:14). In Rev. 1:7,8 and Rev.
22:13, Jesus is shown to possess the attribute of eternal self existence
that Isaiah 41:4, Isaiah 44:6, and Isaiah 48:12 clearly teach is an attribute
belonging exclusively to Jehovah God. In Philippians 2:9-11, the worship
that Paul said belonged to Jesus Christ was exactly the same worship that
Isaiah 45:22-25 said belonged exclusively to Jehovah. Many acts that Jehovah
of the Old Testament declared He would do, Christ did and declared His
acts to he the fulfillment of those prophecies. Compare Isaiah 44:22,23
which declares Jehovah to he the redeemer. to Eph. 1:7 which declares Jesus
Christ to he the redeemer. Compare Isaiah 54:17 which declares Jehovah
to he our righteousness, to I Cor. 1:30 which says Jesus Christ is our
righteousness. Compare Isaiah 43:11 which teaches that only Jehovah is
the Savior of man, to Titus 2:13 which says so plainly that Jesus Christ
is that Savior. Col. 2:9,10 declares that "in Him dwelleth all the fullness
of the Godhead bodily", and that we are complete in Him, which is the head
of all principality and power. "Jehovah's Witnesses" deny this. Friend,
this denial makes them not just 'misled Christians', but salesmen for the
serpent, ambassadors for Satan, enemies of Christ, and the finished work
of His cross.
They claim that hell is the grave and that the wicked dead definitely do not go into literal and eternal fire to suffer forever. I must admit that I cannot blame them for wishing this were so. I did when I was lost. Scripture, however, is the criteria for truth and not human preference. what does the Bible teach? It teaches that the wicked shall he turned into hell and all nations that forget God (Psalms 9:17). If hell were only the grave as the "Jehovah's Witnesses" teach, how could a difference be made here between the wicked and the righteous, for the righteous also go to the grave The "Jehovah's Witnesses" beguile with much unlearned talk about translation, pointing out that hell is translated from such words as Sheol in the Old Testament and Hades, Tartarus and Gehenna in the New Testament. Now most any Bible student knows that this is true, remember, though, that Satan never tells a lie without wrapping it up in a truth. The "Jehovah's Witnesses" thus claim that these words mean either grave or some temporal fire and never eternal punishment. This is the devil's punch line. It is near enough truth that the unlearned might well fall for it and yet it is 100% false. Not one single time is any of these words which are translated hell in the Bible, also translated grave when speaking of a sepulchre, a hole in the ground or any resting place of the physical hody, but only when referring to the state of death. There were physical graves in the Bible, but they were not one single time referred to by the Hebrew word Sheol or the Greek word Hades. So all their "scholarly talk" about translation is only a smoke screen of the devil to divert attention from the Bible doctrine of eternal punishment.
"Jehovah's Witnesses" depict hell as something no one would need to fear. Both hell and the lake of fire are held forth in Scripture as something to be greatly feared (Rev. 20:14,15). It is referred to as eternal torment (Rev. 14:11, Luke 16:24 and Mark 9:43-48). The "Jehovah's Witnesses" either explain this all away, ignore it, or claim it to he a quick, physical annihilation of the wicked, just which ever is expedient for their cause at the time. They never try to teach any truth from these passages, they just cloud them and abandon them.
Let us see what Christ taught about hell in Mark 9:43-48. Now the "Jehovah's Witnesses" cloud this passage by pointing to the original Greek word which is here translated hell. This is of no consequence at all. Call the word clover instead of hell if you wish, you will still see what Jesus Christ was teaching about the place of this passage. Please turn in your Bible to Mark 9:43-48, and read these verses carefully. (1) Hell is the opposite of eternal life, for He constantly refers to it as the alternative to life. You must also see that it is eternal life to which He refers for He speaks to people who have temporal life and He speaks to them about entering into Life. (2) It is fire. Now again I remind you that even if the "Jehovah's Witnesses" translate this word clover instead of hell, Christ still assures us of the intent of His teaching by constantly saying that this place He is speaking of, is fire. In these five verses alone Jesus refers to hell with the word fire six times. (3) This fire is eternal. He continually reminded them that this fire is not quenched. Now there is no earthly way in which you can give any, and I mean any, credibility to the "Jehovah's Witnesses" interpretation of this passage without accusing the Lord of having deceptive intent in His teaching.
Certainly nothing would please Satan more than to persuade
the world to eat, drink and be merry, for tomorrow we die and there is
no punishment in the hereafter.' He has sent his salesmen around the world
and so convincing to the natural mind is their 'sales-pitch,' that only
God's word, rightly divided, can silence their vile mouths.
In no place does Satan strike so vitally at the Gospel as in this lie, for faith in His death, burial and bodily resurrection is absolutely vital to the Salvation of the soul (1 Cor.15:1-4).
If you ask a "Jehovah's Witness" if they believe in the resurrection of Christ, they will say yes and probably try to drop the subject. If you, however, say the bodily resurrection, they will deny it. They try to establish their hellish denial with the misuse of such verses as (1 Cor. 15:50). "Flesh and blood cannot inherit the Kingdom of God." This verse, in fact, teaches exactly the opposite of their interpretation. Wherever the Bible talks of the resurrection of Christ it is without exception speaking of His bodily resurrection. (I) The word resurrect means to raise from the dead. Who is stupid or profane enough to claim that His spirit died, and thus that His resurrection could possibly be spiritual? His spirit did not die. It was commended into the hands of God (Luke 23:46). He, in the spirit, went to paradise (Luke 23:43). His resurrection could not have been spiritual unless His death was spiritual. (2) Wherever the resurrection is attested to, His body is the subject. In Matthew 28 and Luke 24, all will agree that the subject is the resurrection. In Luke 24:2 it was the absence of the body that gave them the first hint of the reality of Christ's resurrection. In Luke 24:4 and 5 the angels said what these people sought was not there, but was risen. Were they seeking His spirit? No, they were obviously seeing His body. In Luke 24:16, the Emmaus disciples' "eyes were holden" so that they would not recognize Jesus. Was it a body or a spirit that their eyes could have beheld and recognized? (3) The Lord Himself said that His resurrection was bodily (Luke 24:39). He said to His frightened disciples, "A spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have." He showed them His hands and feet. Is flesh, and are hands, feet and bones part of a body, or are they part of a spirit? Not only so, but Jesus took food and ate in their presence to prove that He was not "a spirit" but was physical and tangible (Luke 24:39). God is not the author of confusion. The "Jehovah's Witnesses" doctrine of the resurrection is exactly like Satan's. It is' in fact, his "sales-pitch." Ask one of them what happened to His body and see how close his answer comes to that lie the Roman soldiers were hired to tell in Matthew 28:12-16.
Flesh and blood (1 Cor. 12:50) is a collective term used to refer to the natural, depraved, sinful body. No Bible student believes that this sinful body will inherit the Kingdom of God. The Bible teaches that our new body (resurrected or translated) will be a sinless, spiritual body.
We could easily go on and establish with equal certainty that
"Jehovah's Witnesses" promote equally Satanic, unscriptural doctrines on
the subjects of Christ's return, the trinity, the Holy Spirit, the creation,
the blood atonement, the nature of human blood, the scripture, heaven,
patriotism, salvation, etc, etc, etc. They, in fact, with all their volumes
and masses of pamphlets deal with, or should say misdeal with, less than
7% of the entire Bible. Just try to find a verse by verse exposition of
any book of the Bible written by the "Jehovah's Witnesses.' You will not
Order tract K-11 from
Bethel Baptist Church - Watchman Press
1902 NW Columbia - Lawton OK 73507-5609