By Gary Ray Branscome
Up to this point our
focus has been on the divine origin of the Bible, its inspiration, and the fact
that every part of it is God-breathed. I pointed out that the words, It is
easier for heaven and earth to pass away, than for one letter of the law to
fail, tell us that even the letters were inspired by God (Luke
The first two properties that
I call to your attention are the divine truthfulness and unity of
Scripture. While the sections following this one will focus on some of the other
attributes of Scripture, because these two properties are closely related to, and
dovetail perfectly with, the doctrine of the inspiration of Scripture, much
that can be said about them has already been said.
Regarding the
truthfulness of Scripture, because the Bible is the Word of God, and God
cannot lie, all that the Bible says is true (Titus 1:2). And, all of the
Bible passages that testify to the divine inspiration of Scripture also testify
to its truthfulness. As to its truthfulness, Jesus Himself, in prayer to the
Father, said, Your word is truth (John
Regarding the unity of
Scripture, even though God moved men to write down the words, because the words
were inspired by God the Bible is the Word of God. And, because God is its real
author, the Bible only contains one theology, His theology. And, His Word testifies
to that fact when it says, All the prophets testify of Him [Christ] that
through His name whoever believes in Him will receive forgiveness of sins
(Acts
One attack on the
inspiration of Scripture that I have not yet dealt with is the attack on the
divine unity of Scripture. This attack assumes that the Bible is not
inspired by God, and, therefore, that there must be a natural explanation for
its existence, and that the men who wrote it must have had differences in their
thinking. Some who accept that assumption then let their imagination run wild,
twisting some statements to contradict others when they could just as well be
interpreted to agree. And, by doing so they only show their ignorance, because
they violate one of the fundamental rules of Bible interpretation, the rule
that no passage of Scripture should ever be interpreted to contradict what the Bible
says elsewhere. As it is written, If they do not speak according to this
word, it is because there is no light in them (Isaiah
The people I have in mind
pick out statements made by different Apostles, and then claim to see different
theologies, theologies that only exist in their minds. Others imagine that the
first two chapters of Genesis give different accounts of creation, even though
Christs words, He who made them at the beginning made them male and female,
and said, For this reason a man will leave father and mother, and
will be united to his wife, quote from both chapters as from one account (Matthew
19:4-5). Others ignore the historical evidence pointing to Moses as the writer
of the first five books of Scripture, and then, out of pure fantasy, fabricate different
writers for different parts of the Pentateuch. Of course their entire construct
is nothing more than the product of an overactive imagination (a fairy story),
yet they prefer their lie to the truth. For that reason, their attack on the
unity of Scripture is a perfect illustration of the words, God
has
scattered the proud in the imagination of their hearts (Luke
A Guide to Interpreting Gods Word
The properties of Holy
Scripture guide us in our interpretation of Scripture. For example: Because one
of its properties is its unity, we should never interpret one passage of
scripture to contradict another. Because it has the authority of God
behind it, we should conform our thinking to it while rejecting any
interpretation that contradicts what it says. Because its purpose is to
testify of Christ, we should interpret all that it says in the light of its
testimony of Christ. Because it is sufficient, containing everything
needed for our salvation, we should never try to supplement what it says, or read
unscriptural ideas into it. And, because it is clear, the meaning God
intends for us to get from it is exactly what the words say, nothing more, the
plain grammatical meaning of the words, the same meaning that you are placing
on my words as you read this.