VITAL DOCTRINES AND UNANSWERED QUESTIONS

 

By Gary Ray Branscome

 

          In theology a distinction is made between those doctrines that form the very foundation of the Christian faith, vital doctrines that cannot be denied without undermining faith and subverting the work of the gospel: and those doctrines which are not the foundation of saving faith. For example: our salvation does not depend upon knowing that David was king, or that Paul was beaten with rods. However, that does not mean that those doctrines are unimportant, or that we should tolerate those who attack or deny them.

          First of all, everything recorded in the Bible was placed there by God for a reason. Therefore, every attempt to attack, deny, or explain away something the Bible says is an attack on God, and no church worth its salt will tolerate such attacks. Secondly, in the past some churches have allowed people to attack and deny vital doctrines of the Christian faith while justifying that denial with the claim, “it does not affect salvation”. One doctrine that I am thinking of specifically is the doctrine of creation. In fact, I might say creation and the flood because denying either one of them undermines faith in Christ.

          The Bible not only records the events of creation in straightforward historical narrative, but whenever it is referred to elsewhere in Scripture, it is referred to as historical fact. For example: In answering a question about divorce, Jesus referred to creation, saying, “Have you not read that He who made them at the beginning made them male and female” (Matthew 19:4).   

Those who counter what the Bible says about creation and try to get around it only do so because they have been influenced by a bogus history of the world that is disguised as science. They obviously place more stock in the opinions of men than the Word of God. You may have encountered people who claim to be Christian even though they reject what the Bible says about creation. However, if they are Christian, it is only because they are harboring a contradiction in their mind, and have not taken their rejection of creation to its logical conclusion. Otherwise it would destroy their faith. A person who rejects what the Bible says about creation while still regarding the Bible as the Word of God is not thinking clearly. It is totally inconsistent for someone to reject what the Bible says about creation and yet regard Jesus [who referred to it as fact] as God. It is totally inconsistent for someone to reject what the Bible says about creation while accepting the doctrine of the fall and redemption, and that doctrine is basic to the gospel (Romans 5:12-21). And, Christ condemns all such inconsistency with the words, “O fools, and slow of heart to believe everything the prophets have said” (Luke 24:25). 

          Even if rejecting what the Bible says about creation does not instantly bring God’s condemnation and wrath, it tends to undermine faith and often results in children who walk away from the faith. My point is that everything that the Bible says is important. No part of it can be denied without consequences. And, everyone who contradicts and explains away any statement of Scripture, is “Making the word of God of no effect” (Mark 7:13).

 

Unanswered Questions

          Another issue theologians have to deal with has to do with questions about matters on which the Bible has not spoken. In many cases those questions have to do with indifferent matters; that is matters that do not involve a moral issue, and are neither commanded nor forbidden by God’s Word. In such cases the rule is that we do not add to or go beyond what the Bible says. If the Bible does not address a particular issue, then that is what we should say. However, modern technology often creates moral dilemmas that have to be addressed. Two of those are cloning and in-vitro fertilization. Matters such as that are not morally neutral because they destroy lives. In regard to in-vitro fertilization that is obvious because the process is to fertilize several human eggs, select the one wanted and kill the rest. That is murder! Cloning is prone to cause miscarriage and deformity, and for that reason it is not being promoted like it was a few years ago. However, I want to stress the fact that no one has the right to just teach anything he pleases about matters that Scripture does not address. When it comes to moral issues, Christians need to take the moral high ground, and stand for what is high, good, pure and right. Believers should never use the silence of Scripture as an excuse to rationalize matters that are contrary tothe law written in their hearts,” (Romans 2:15). Our desire should always be to exalt Christ, and to that end our views and conduct should always conform to, “Whatever is true, whatever is honest, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely,” and “whatever is of good report” (Philippians 4:8).

 

“Every one who sets aside the clear testimony of God's Word in a single point rejects the entire Word of God as the only source and standard of faith.” (John Theodore Mueller, Christian Dogmatics, page 54)